Iceberg Ross Sea, Antarctica. Photo © Bruce Luyendyk |
A few weeks ago I posted about discoveries that showed dynamic collapse of marine-based parts of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet is underway (May 20, 2014). What I want to explore now is the current thinking of scientists on the role of Antarctica in sea level change this century.
It will come as no surprise that sea level is projected to rise from the influence of global warming. This is discussed in both the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) AR5 report (Assessment Report Five 2013) and the 2014 National Climate Assessment. What do these reports say about sea level change and Antarctica’s role – and do the reports address the dynamic collapse scenarios revealed by studies published in the last few months?
First some basics - how much would sea level rise if ALL the
polar ice caps melted (this would take thousands of years even at today’s
warming levels and higher). Answers, all of Antarctica, 58.3 meters (188 feet)1,
West Antarctic Ice Sheet (WAIS) alone 4.3 meters (13.9 feet)1, Antarctic
Peninsula 0.2 meters (0.6 feet)1,
Greenland, about 7 meters (22.6 feet)2. Thus, 211 feet of sea
level rise for all the ice sheets – my home on a Santa Barbara hill would be
under 50 feet of water if it lasts a few thousand years!3 But let’s
focus on this century –three human generations – and the rise expected by 2100.
For this century the IPCC has synthesized the research on
the course of sea level and comes up with a range of 0.28 to 0.98 meters of
rise (10 inches to 3.2 feet) by 21002 (Figure below). The 2014 National
Climate Assessment using a different methodology comes up with 1 to 4 feet. The
largest contributor to sea level rise is thermal expansion of a warmer ocean – over
one-third of the total. Other contributions are melting of mountain glaciers,
runoff from depletion of ground water, and ice sheet melting. In the later
parts of the 20th century sea level rise has accelerated to about 3
millimeters/year (0.12 inches/yr)2. Ice sheet melting has contributed
about 20% or so of this. The polar ice sheets are not loosing mass (ice) at the
same rate. Greenland is melting faster2. Numbers for the Antarctic
ice sheet show a rise of about 4 mm/19 years calculated from mass loss
estimated by satellite radar and gravity data and 7 mm/19 years for Greenland4.
This decrease in mass through the steady process of ice outflow and melting
represents a change in Surface Mass Balance – a loss. This is different than
the ice sheet collapse that I discussed in my May 20 entry.
Projecting forward towards the year 2100 the IPCC summarizes
that Antarctica could actually contribute to sea level fall if snowfall increases from enhanced evaporation of the warmer
surrounding ocean. It seems however that increased snowfall occurs now on East Antarctica
but increased outflow of ice in West Antarctica and the Antarctic Peninsula overrides
the positive accumulation on East Antarctica – mass was lost towards the end of
the 20th century. Modeling predicts that eventually ice accumulation
will exceed outflow and the mass of ice on Antarctica will increase slightly or
stay the same. However, the IPCC analyses do not account for dynamic changes in
outflow of ice due to a warming ocean – for example speeding up of glaciers.
Those dynamics of outflow are still a work in progress in the research
community.
The IPCC concludes that the processes controlling Antarctic
Mass Balance predict a small or negligible contribution to sea level rise by
2100. However, their report does recognize the potential for collapse of
marine-based parts of the WAIS starting now or in the next few decades. This
raises the possibility of an added contribution to sea level rise of a few
tenths of a meter (490-785 mm; 1-2 feet or more)2. That number would
be added to the totals above, that is, not 1-4 feet but 2-6 feet of rise by
2100. Their report was written before the results on the nascent marine-based WAIS
collapse were published this spring, but they do recognize that possibility.
What’s the bottom line about Antarctic ice and global
warming at this point in time?
In the words of IPCC2,
First, “Projections suggest a substantial increase in 21st century Antarctic snowfall, mainly because a warmer atmosphere would be able to carry more moisture into polar regions. Regional changes in atmospheric circulation probably play a secondary role. For the whole of the Antarctic ice sheet, this process is projected to contribute between 0 and 70 mm to sea level fall [emphasis added].”
Second, “There are strong indications that enhanced outflow (primarily in West Antarctica) currently outweighs any increase in snow accumulation (mainly in East Antarctica), implying a tendency towards sea level rise.”
Third, “Before reliable projections of outflow over the 21st century can be made with greater confidence, models that simulate ice flow need to be improved,…”
Last, “Sea level could rise if the effects of marine instability [collapse of marine-based portions of the ice sheets] become important, but there is not enough evidence at present to unambiguously identify the precursor of such an unstable retreat.”
Regardless, it is clear that even with present imperfect
information and understanding of Antarctic ice sheet stability societies
around the world need to prepare for several feet of sea level rise over the
next 86 years.
______________
2 Church, J.A., P.U. Clark, A. Cazenave, J.M. Gregory, S.
Jevrejeva, A. Levermann, M.A. Merrifield, G.A. Milne, R.S. Nerem, P.D. Nunn,
A.J. Payne, W.T. Pfeffer, D. Stammer and A.S. Unnikrishnan, 2013: Sea Level
Change. In: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of
Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel
on Climate Change [Stocker, T.F., D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S.K.
Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex and P.M. Midgley (eds.)].
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA.
3 These numbers are equivalent values that do not take into
account isostatic adjustments.
4 Shepherd, A., Ivins, E. R., A, G., Barletta, V. R.,
Bentley, M. J., Bettadpur, S., Briggs, K. H., Bromwich, D. H., Forsberg, R.,
Galin, N., Horwath, M., Jacobs, S., Joughin, I., King, M. A., Lenaerts, J. T.
M., Li, J., Ligtenberg, S. R. M., Luckman, A., Luthcke, S. B., McMillan, M.,
Meister, R., Milne, G., Mouginot, J., Muir, A., Nicolas, J. P., Paden, J.,
Payne, A. J., Pritchard, H., Rignot, E., Rott, H., Sørensen, L. S., Scambos, T.
A., Scheuchl, B., Schrama, E. J. O., Smith, B., Sundal, A. V., Angelen, J. H.
v., Berg, W. J. v. d., Broeke, M. R. v. d., Vaughan, D. G., Velicogna, I.,
Wahr, J., Whitehouse, P. L., Wingham, D. J., Yi, D., Young, D., and Zwally, H.
J., 2012, A Reconciled Estimate of Ice-Sheet Mass Balance: Science, v. 338, p.
1183-1189.
No comments:
Post a Comment